Ride-and-Drives

We love offering people ride-alongs and to drive our vehicles! It gives us an opportunity to close the gap of information with all the myths out there about EVs. When someone really experiences the differences in an electric vehicle; they get it. It’s hard to explain for someone who hasn’t ever driven or riden in one.

We can’t promise test drives or test rides at all events, but we encourage all event participants to consider the benefits of letting someone experience what makes you love EVs so much.

“Acceleration, Advanced driving Technology. Safety”

Drive Electric Event Followup

For National Drive Electric Week we gathered local Reno, Nevada electric vehicle owners in the parking lot of Virginia Lake. This was a convenient location with a large gazebo, playground and what we thought was enough parking...(stay tuned).

IMG_0866.jpg

We expected a large number of vehicles and guests but we never thought we’d run out of parking!! The turnout from the community was great! Local electric vehicle drivers not only showed off their cars but also provide information on how theirs was different than the model next to it.

There were 30 electric vehicles on display and offering test-rides to the public, the media, and policymakers. On Sunday, September 9th, the Electric Auto Association of Northern Nevada and Tesla Motors Club Reno NorCAl hosted an electric car celebration at Virginia Lake Park in Reno from 9 AM to 2 PM:

Reno Councilwoman Naomi Durr made opening remarks to the crowd.

There were a total of 37 plug-in and electric cars including 21 Teslas that included an original Roadster, as well as S, X and 3. Attendees were able to experience ‘ludacris’ mode in a P100D Tesla Model S.

“How was ‘insane’ mode? I wasn’t prepared for that power and my head hit the seat behind me. LOL”

Other EVs showcased can be seen in the registration image below. The variety of years/models included Chevrolet Bolt EV and Volt, Nissan LEAFs that included a 2018 model, 2018 Honda Clarity Plug-in Hybrid EV, Toyota RAV4 EV, Mitsubishi i-MiEV, Ford Focus Electric, BMW Mini-E, Volkswagen e-Golf, electric scooter, and Zero electric motorcycles.

IMG_0820.jpg

Exhibitors and vendors at the event included SEE Autonomy, Glory Cloud Coffee, Tesla Gigafactory, NV Energy, Northern Nevada First Responders and Fire Departments, Sierra Club, Plug In America, “Yes on 6” electoral initiative campaign, Drive Electric, BMW Reno, Bill Pearce Courtesy Honda, and Zero Electric Motorcycles.

Reno’s Fire Department discussed safety and differences between internal combustion engines and electric vehicles. Reno Councilwoman Naomi Duerr spoke about to the public about the local sustainable energy programs. Local businesses such as Tesla Motors and Glory Cloud Coffee Roasters were present.

Thank you to our sponsors who helped make this event so much fun. Here’s more info on each supporter of electric vehicles in Nevada.


The Electric Automobile Association of Northern Nevada is organizing Reno’s Electric Drive event. Glory Cloud Coffee Roasters and SEE Autonomy are local platinum sponsors. Plug In America, the Sierra Club and the Electric Auto Association are national organizers. The Nissan LEAF® is the exclusive national automotive sponsor.

About Plug In America: Plug In America is the nation’s leading independent consumer voice for accelerating the use of plug-in electric vehicles in the United States. Formed as a non-profit in 2008, Plug In America provides practical, objective information collected from our coalition of plug-in vehicle drivers, through public outreach and education, policy work and a range of technical advisory services. Our expertise represents the world’s deepest pool of experience of driving and living with plug-in vehicles. The organization conceived National Drive Electric Week and has advanced workplace charging by pioneering ride-and-drive events at such leading corporations as Google, Mattel and Paramount Pictures. We drive electric. You can too. pluginamerica.org

About the Sierra Club: The Sierra Club is the nation’s oldest and largest grassroots environmental organization with more than 2.4 million members and supporters and chapters in all 50 states. The Sierra Club’s national electric vehicles initiative advocates for a switch to EVs as one important way to reduce emissions and cut oil consumption. Sierra Club is proud to have been one of the three national groups organizing National Drive Electric Week since its inception in 2011. www.sierraclub.org/EVGuide


Reno's National Drive Electric Event 9/9/18

Our National Drive Electric Week event is happening on Sunday, 9/9/18 at Virginia Lake, Reno, NV from 9am-2pm.

 

The Electric Automobile Association of Northern Nevada, (or EAANN – because it’s a mouthful) is a nonprofit that promotes electric vehicles. This FREE community event is a unique opportunity for people to learn about the technology and safety directly from industry leaders.

 

Event Details

The event will be held at Virginia Lake, Reno, NV at the park and picnic area. At 9am, Reno Councilwoman, Naomi Duerr will make opening remarks. There are 30 vehicles registered as display cars for a total of 492,000 electric miles driven. Help us reach our goal of 500,000 EV miles by sharing this information with your friends and registering your EV here.

Snip20180907_6.png

 

Each car will be labeled DISPLAY VEHICLE (do not touch), RIDE ALONG (get in and check it out) or TEST DRIVE (with owner’s permission).

Event Vendors

  • SEE Autonomy
  • Glory Cloud Coffee
  • Sparks City Councilman, Donald Abbott
  • Reno City Councilwoman, Naomi Duerr
  • Tesla Gigafactory1 Team
  • Tesla Motors Club Reno NorCal
  • NV Energy
  • Reno Fire Department
  • Sierra Club
  • Plug In America
  • Yes on 6 Campaign
  • Electric Auto Association
  • BMW Reno
  • Bill Pearce Courtesy Honda
  • Zero Electric Motorcycle

 

We look forward to Sunday’s opening remarks by Councilwoman Naomi Duerr and meeting car enthusiasts to talk over Glory Cloud Coffee.

Have any questions? Just shoot us an email!

 

sincerely,

Electric Auto Association of Northern Nevada

 

Are you looking for a good used EV?

They're getting easier to find as more dealerships have cars coming back off leases, or owners trade up the next new and shiny (and longer range) EV. I was surprised to see that Tesla was including pre-owned inventory on their website, and sites like AutoList have filters designed to show you a wide variety of EVs.

It seems like local folks are having a pretty easy time at places like CarMax ... even if they don't have it on the lot today, they'll find it.  So, don't let the fear of 'brand new' pricing slow your entry into the brave new world of electric driving. Your first - or next EV - might be as close as your local used car dealer. And, we'll hazard to suggest that buying a used EV might be a lot less stressful than buying a used internal combustion engine car - considering the handful of moving parts in an EV. You won't need to worry about a crap timing belt, water pump, fuel pump, transmission ......

Screenshot 2018-06-12 22.28.40.png

Yes, you can take the all-American Road Trip in an electric vehicle

Well, not any EV at this time. A Tesla, with it's charging network, is the obvious choice for those who can afford it. But there are other options. Our Chevrolet Volt plug-in extended range hybrid would do it easily with the petite gasoline engine that powers a generator - the range with the pure electric is over 300 miles. A Chevy Bolt would also be an interesting choice - with the right route planning.

True, range-anxiety-free EVs aren't that far off. So, fasten your seat belts, get the road music cued up, and get ready to ride. Read all about it in Afar magazine ....

And, if you have an EV road trip story to share, we'd love to hear about it.

 

Screenshot 2018-06-12 22.13.29.png

 

 

The delicious details of the Jaguar Roadster conversion

The car is a vintage silver-blue 1968 Jaguar E-Type Roadster with one crucial, and major, modification: Its famous six-cylinder gasoline-powered XK motor was replaced with an all-electric drivetrain.

 The newly married Duke and Duchess of Sussex left Windsor Castle in a Jaguar Roadster that was modified to be all-electric. Steve Parsons/Press Association, via Associated Press

The newly married Duke and Duchess of Sussex left Windsor Castle in a Jaguar Roadster that was modified to be all-electric. Steve Parsons/Press Association, via Associated Press

Where the motor had been, Jaguar Land Rover technicians installed a lithium-ion battery pack capable of powering the car for about 170 miles on a charge (less than Tesla’s new Model 3 mass-market car, but perhaps the Jaguar has better braking). And in place of the gearbox, they installed a 220-kilowatt electric motor.

All of that was done without cutting or otherwise modifying the car’s frame, and the new drivetrain weighs about the same as the old one, so there was no need to change the suspension. Such “nondestructive modification” is important, said Nathan Hoyt, a spokesman for Jaguar Land Rover North America, because while owners of vintage Jaguars may wish to switch to an all-electric drive, they may want to reinstall the gasoline motor to sell the vehicle.

“It gives customers options without having to worry about doing permanent harm to the car,” Mr. Hoyt said.

A few other changes were made: the dashboard was swapped out with a new one with gauges to monitor electrical performance, the vintage incandescent headlights were replaced with more efficient LED bulbs, and the gas tank fill tube was removed in favor of an electrical coupling for charging the battery.

Many viewers noted that the steering wheel was on the left-hand side; Mr. Hoyt said this particular car, a one-off prototype that was first shown last fall, was originally exported to the American market after it was manufactured 50 years ago.

Jaguar Land Rover has been weighing reaction to it and may decide to go ahead with a program in which customers could order a new, all-electric E-Type or have their existing vintage car converted at the factory.

Either way, an electric Jaguar won’t come cheap. Mr. Hoyt said that a complete factory restoration of an E-Type that remains gasoline-powered typically costs about $390,000. An electric version would cost even more.

EV naysayers working hard to discredit clean transportation

Electric vehicle naysayers have been really busy of late. Jeffrey Middlebrook offered up arguments designed to show that EVs owner/drivers are "clueless" and "arrogant". Between his beef with Tesla owners/drivers and legitimate concerns over world population, we thought we'd offer a few alternatives to his sometimes tortured EV logic.

 Mr. Middlebrook is right in noting that it takes 15% more energy to produce a Tesla - or any EV - than it does an ICE (internal combustion engine) vehicle. What he neglected to mention: Once an EV is driven, that calculus changes. Dramatically.

Mr. Middlebrook is right in noting that it takes 15% more energy to produce a Tesla - or any EV - than it does an ICE (internal combustion engine) vehicle. What he neglected to mention: Once an EV is driven, that calculus changes. Dramatically.

 

 

Jeffrey Middlebrook ( 05.17.18 RNR ‘The EV nonsense and its buffs’) wields a really big brush, with which to tar all Tesla owner/drivers as “clueless” and arrogant, and all electrons as equally dirty.  We’re not sure where the rest of EV owner/drivers such as ourselves, who might or might not own a Tesla (or a Nissan LEAF, Chevy Volt, Spark EV or Bolt, Honda Clarity EV, BMW i3, or any other EV) stand.  Are we ‘clueless’ and arrogant by extension? I sense more than a whiff of ‘class anxiety’ opposed to the usual ‘range anxiety’ expressed by non-EV drivers. 

Mr. Middlebrook is right in noting that it takes 15% more energy to produce a Tesla - or any EV - than it does an ICE (internal combustion engine) vehicle. What he neglected to mention: Once an EV is driven, that calculus changes. Dramatically. This extra emissions ‘debt’ is quickly recovered by the savings accrued over the driving life of an EV ( as expressed in Total Cost of Ownership).  The average new gasoline vehicle in the U.S. is rated 25 mpg.  Based on where EVs have been bought to date, the average EV now produces emissions equivalent to a hypothetical gasoline car getting 73 mpg. We’re not aware of any mass-production fossil fuel car on the market today that achieves that, including the full-sized ICE Cadillac (22mpg City/30mpg Hwy) that Middlebrook references. EV drivers don’t add to the aggregate emissions debt by requiring the drilling, transport to production site, refining, transport to pump that ICE drivers do. Then, consider the EV total cost of ownership (TCO) savings of no more oil changes, timing belts, fuel/water pumps, transmission repairs on top of the zero gallons of gasoline purchased, soon you’re talking real value for your wallet and the environment.

Typical of fossil-fuel apologists, they fail to look critically at the true costs of a gallon of gasoline. According to the IMF (International Monetary Fund) the price of gasoline in the U.S. barely covers the costs of production and distribution (forgetting for the moment how heavily fossil fuel industries have been subsidized over the last century) and is estimated to be in excess of half a trillion dollars a year in direct subsidies. Some governments spend more on energy subsidies than they do on education and healthcare. The cost per gallon at the pump doesn’t reflect the costs to society of: traffic, congestion, pollution and global warming. And, the price at the pump certainly fails to capture the financial and human cost of lives lost to foreign wars in the Middle East.  The IMF and other governments are now suggesting that those subsidies should be curtailed, which would reduce deficits and do something about global climate change at the same time. 

 

Then, let’s look at the assertion that charging that rich white persons’ toy, the Tesla, will be using ‘dirty’ electrons at far-flung charging stations, even if the electons at home come from rooftop PV. And, gasp!, there were emissions produced by the very production of PV panels! First of all, this ain’t your daddy’s dirty electrical grid anymore.  It’s ‘greening’ at a rate that was unexpected even a decade ago, as there are no new coal-fired power plants on the drawing boards, and many existing plants are scheduled for decommission as natural gas and renewables become ever cheaper to produce. It is now in the best interest of a utility companies bottom-line (and shareholder value) to transition to natural gas and renewables. In northern Nevada, it should be noted, the majority of our electrons come from geothermal and natural gas. As with many fundamental and disruptive technological transitions, it’s not yet a perfect solution, but light-years ahead of where we were just a few decades ago. Finally, Tesla - in their unprecedented nationwide roll-out of charging stations - are already converting their charging stations to solar. Yup. Tesla - the company which also installs rooftop PV systems. But, that’s unlikely to sway Mr. Middlebrook, as the metal in the charging stations produced emissions via mining, transport and final production.  Sigh.

There’s no perfect technology. So, we might as well give up and quit striving for something better. That’s called sacrificing the perfectly good at the altar of the perfect.

We agree with Mr. Middlebrook that increasing human population is creating historically unprecedented environmental pressures on societies and the planet. But, this is an issue worthy of an op-ed all its’ own. To suggest that admittedly imperfect technologies and innovation should be jettisoned simply because the “20-ton T-Rex in the room” of over-population hasn’t been solved baffles us.

In the meanwhile, we’ll continue to enjoy the very real cost savings, knowledge that we are, indeed, reducing the aggregate C02 being released into the atmosphere, and laugh like loons each time we get to pull away from  a fossil-fuel bully with smooth, quiet and amazing acceleration that only electricity can provide.

Or, as the Roadrunner might say “beep! beep!”

 

Authors:

Cynthia S. Ryan, Co-Chair, Electric Auto Assoc of Northern Nevada. Owner/driver of a 2014 Nissan LEAF, and a 2017 Chevrolet Volt.

William Brinsmead, Co-Chair, Electric Auto Assoc of Northern Nevada. Owner/driver of a 2015 Tesla Model S, and a 2011 Nissan LEAF, and the 1973 Cadillac eHearse.

 

No, electric vehicles won't cause more pollution (or crash the grid)

Once again, the fossil fuel apologists are hard at work in the press trying to lay every possible bit of negative spin to the electric car. In the May 15th online edition of Politico, Jonathan Lesser took a wild swing at our EVs, and missed in his piece: Are electric cars worse for the environment. I couldn't let it slide, and pounded out a rebuttal - which I've pitched to Politico. In case they don't want it, I'll post it below: 

 Chevrolet Volts getting their electrons from the sun.

Chevrolet Volts getting their electrons from the sun.

Oh, my! Electric vehicle drivers will cause more air pollution, but even worse, too many electric vehicles would actually cause utility rates to rise, and could even ‘crash’ the electrical grid. Or, so claims Jonathan Lesser, in the May 15th online edition of Politico.

Lesser, a well-known ‘energy consultant’ and fossil-fuel sector apologist, argues that only the wealthy can afford electric vehicles, and would like you to still believe in the ‘Long Tailpipe Argument’ which suggests that EVs are only as clean as the power that supplies their electrons, and that’s still ‘dirty’.  If that isn’t enough, too many electric cars could crash the grid.

It’s hard to know where to begin with Lesser’s myriad assertions.

It’s easy for somebody with Lesser’s background to ‘cherry pick’ data to prove their point. In this case, he says that new ICE (internal combustion engines) are much ‘cleaner’ when compared to electric vehicles. Yes, new cars are, indeed, cleaner than “a 30-year-old, smoke-belching Oldsmobile”. But, cleaner than an EV? Not so much. That new cars emit “only about 1%” of the pollution of your grandfathers Oldsmobile misses the point of just how dirty those cars were. And, few people stop to think just how ‘dirty’ the process of refining and transporting gasoline is. In fact, a study by the Union of Concerned Scientists found that the extra emissions from making an 80-mile range EV are only about 15% higher than a comparable gasoline car. This extra emission ‘debt’ is quickly recovered by the savings accrued over the driving life of an EV.  The average new gasoline vehicle in the U.S. is rated 25 mpg.  Based on where EVs have been bought to date, the average EV now produces emissions equivalent to a hypothetical gasoline car getting 73 mpg. We’re not aware of any mass-production fossil fuel car on the market today that achieves that. 

The Union of Concerned Scientists provides a dandy online tool to calculate just how ‘clean’ your EV is according to where you live. In the Reno, Nevada area, a 2014 Nissan LEAF contributes the equivalent emissions to global warming as a gasoline vehicle getting 107 mpg, for example.

Then, Lesser invokes the discredited ‘long tailpipe’ argument (EV electrons are only as clean as the power source they come from). He says “The energy doesn’t come from nowhere”.  Yes, the energy is coming from a rapidly greening grid. He should note that no new coal-fired power plants are being built, while older plants are being phased out. And, since renewables are quickly becoming less expensive than fossil fuel generated electrons, it benefits the bottom-line of any utility to invest in cleaner, renewables.

Lesser says that EV tax incentives (or ‘subsidies’ in his terms) “will disproportionately benefit the wealthy at the expense of the poor”. Nice try, making electric cars a ‘class’ issue. EV naysayers point out that the top-selling EVs with the longest range are in the $40,000 range. ‘Longest range’ is the key. The price of EVs did increase in 2016, but that reflected faster growth in more expensive models and doesn’t take into account increases in driving range through battery improvements. Reductions in battery costs are currently translating into more range rather than lower per vehicle prices. As more cars with ranges of over 300 miles become the norm, EV prices will fall to levels comparable with conventional vehicles. EVs like the 80+ mile range Nissan LEAF are already considered ‘affordable’ by most metrics. And, since most people drive less than 40 miles per day to work and back, or around town that's a good fit for most people. So, that leaves a lot of EVs - both used and new - to supply those of us who aren’t in the Tesla crowd. 

Buying an electric car is one of the most influential decisions a household can make to both reduce emissions, and save money.  The savings on gasoline alone can average more than $800 per year, on top of savings for maintenance since EVs don’t need smog checks, oil changes, transmission repairs, new fuel pumps or timing belts. The economically disadvantaged would benefit from EV ownership over conventional vehicles.

Then, Lesser asserts that utilities - and by extension, ratepayers - will be saddled with paying for “the wires and charging stations” which will raise rates. You’d think the electrical grid was born yesterday. Conversely, electric utilities stand to benefit from EV adoption as they can generate significant new revenues (Time-Of-Use home electric vehicle charging), while facilitating the creation of widespread, convenient network of charging stations. Once a certain scale is achieved in EV adoption, utilities can bring more renewable energy into the system from very large, advanced grid-scale storage batteries (like Tesla just installed in Australia). And, with more widespread adoption, it’s estimated that utilities will capture enough incremental revenue from those who charge their EVs at home to increase access to the ‘garageless’ in lower-income areas, and grow their markets there, as well. This also includes deploying charging stations at workplaces and other visible locations that will in turn drive EV and electric utility sales and consumption. This puts the ‘lie’ to wealthy EV owners taking advantage of the poor.

Economically disadvantaged Americans would particularly benefit from adopting electric vehicles. According to the U.S. Department of Energy: "the average U.S. household spends nearly one-fifth of its total family expenditures on transportation, (and) saving on fuel can make a big difference in terms of the average family's budget. Electricity is less expensive than gasoline and EVs are more efficient than gasoline vehicles. Electricity prices are also generally much more stable than gasoline prices. On a national average, it costs less than half as much to travel the same distance in an EV than a conventional vehicle. In addition, some utilities offer even cheaper rates at night, which can further reduce your electricity costs. "

As for the claim that mandates for more renewable energy, like those in California, will only serve to drive utility prices up for ratepayers, it isn’t proven out by actual practice. Charging EVs at off-peak times - when the grid is underutilized - increases utility revenues without commensurate cost increases. Lower rates will be an added benefit as the ‘pool’ of potential customers is expanded. And, charging EVs when there is spare grid capacity avoids the need for new capital investments by utilities - which will also build downward pressure on electricity rates. Lesser also doesn’t mention that electric utilities can leverage the growing number of EVs on the road to absorb increasing kilowatts of renewable energy that would otherwise be ‘dumped’ when there isn’t sufficient demand.

EV detractors, like Lesser, make a lot of noise about the amounts of energy that will be needed to balance the U.S. electrical grid in the coming decades. However, that need could also be met by the batteries from as few as 10% of the electric vehicles anticipated to be on the road by that time.

In the future, EV batteries could stand in for large-scale storage batteries when needed via V2G (Vehicle to Grid) or ‘Battery Second Life’ systems. A 2016 Nissan LEAF can store as much electricity as the average American home uses in a day, and be recharged while its’ owner is eating or sleeping. This type of V2G technology is already available in other countries - like Japan - and the Tesla home storage battery that is now available in the U.S. This would further stabilize the grid and also possibly lower rates while easing the transition to a cleaner grid.

What will it take to accomplish this? The transportation sector accounts for about one-third of U.S. carbon pollution. EVs need to account for 40% or more of new vehicle sales by 2030 in order to meet long-term carbon reduction targets. If you think this can’t be done, remember that over a period of two weeks, nearly 400,000 people put down $1,000 deposits for the Tesla Model 3. There is already a pent-up demand for electric vehicles as the old ‘range anxiety’ becomes a quaint artifact of the past.

To this end, utility policies need to be amended to remove the barriers to EV purchases, facilitate a more competitive market for charging services, and prepare utilities to integrate the EV load (which would mean encouraging driver/owners to charge at off-peak times) and later provide V2G services.

Widespread EV adoption is a welcome gift to a competitive, resilient renewable energy market, and hardly the malign influence that the fossil fuel industry would have us believe.

Electric utilities are singularly positioned to provide ubiquitous access to charging (Lesser’s overblown concerns over “wires and charging stations” notwithstanding )—while supporting the grid and facilitating its transition to variable resources like wind and solar energy, benefiting all customers, and returning value to EV drivers.

As electric vehicle advocates, we understand that the issues surrounding a rapidly evolving energy landscape in the U.S. is complex and at times difficult to communicate. And, not everybody is tuned in to the language of megawatts and EV range. However, we don’t think that articles such as the one by Mr. Lesser are helpful, and certainly, do more harm than good by posing specious dog-whistle arguments that appeal only to fossil fuel true believers.

 

 

More drivers discovering the value of driving electric

Many thanks to our friend 'down south', Stan Hanel, Outreach Coordinator, Nevada Electric Vehicle Accelerator (NEVA) program. REA250.org

The Electric Drive Transportation Association published its monthly sales figures for plug-in electric cars nationwide during March 2018. There was quite a surge in sales during March, compared to January and February:

 

https://electricdrive.org/index.php?ht=d/sp/i/20952/pid/20952

 

Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles (PHEVs): 10,882

Battery Electric Vehicles (BEVs):               14,480

                                                                   ----------

Total Plug-in Electric Car Sales                  25,362

 

I updated the running total on the home page of the Nevada Electric Vehicle Accelerator (NEVA) program website to show 808,892 total plug-in electric vehicles sold, since mass-market adoption began during late 2010 with the Nissan LEAF and Chevrolet Volt.

EDTA also tracks the quantity of public Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment (EVSE) charging stations available in the United States. There are currently 20,189 public charging stations available. Many stations have dual plugs or outlets, so total outlets available nationwide are 52,673.

The 'Long Tailpipe' argument runs out of gas for EV advocates

Electric Auto Association of Northern Nevadamembers are surprised to learn that electric vehicles are a bad idea: expensive and not all that “green,”according to David Rothbard and Craig Rucker of CFACT, a climate-change-denying “public policy” organization.

We applaud CFACT for their willingness to carry water for the Koch brothers.

If the price tag on electric cars is holding buyers back, automotive website Edmunds provides a calculator to determine the true cost to own. As an example, a 2018 Nissan Leaf has a true cost of $36,066, versus a 2018 Nissan Rogue at $38,822. The true cost to own also doesn’t take into consideration any tax Incentives given to EV buyers, which further reduce the total cash price around $7,500, making the electric vehicle an even better value.

Driving both a Volt and a Leaf, my 2014 Leaf can be had for well under $9,000 with plenty of battery life remaining. If that’s not affordable (considering that the owner will never need to buy gas, change the oil, get a smog check, replace a timing belt/fuel pump/water pump or many other combustion car maintenance items) then I don’t know what is.

Regarding the claim that EVs get their “green” from “dirty” sources (aka the "long tailpipe" argument), Nevadans have access to some of the cleanest energy in the nation, with 21.6 percent of Nevada's utility-scale net electricity generation from renewable sources. Two-thirds of all Americans now live in areas where driving an EV produces fewer climate emissions than almost all comparable gasoline and gas hybrid cars. To blame EVs for the failings of antiquated power generation in “heartland America” seems silly.

fullsizeoutput_27bd.jpeg

 

Although manufacturing a midsized EV can result in higher emissions compared to a combustion vehicle, that math changes radically once that EV is driven. Electricity is cleaner than gasoline, and battery electric cars make up for their higher manufacturing emissions within six to 18 months and continue to outperform combustion cars until the end of their lives. The Union of Concerned Scientists offers a great tool for analyzing just how clean electric vehicles are. My 2017 Chevrolet Volt “produces about as much global warming pollution as a gasoline vehicle getting 77 mpg,” according to the site. Actually, this is assuming that I’m pulling my electrons from the NV Energy grid. Instead, I generate my own electrons from rooftop solar — and that would push this 77 mpg number far higher.

fullsizeoutput_2f28.jpeg

We believe it makes sense to insist on cleaner tailpipe emissions since more Americans suffer immediate, direct effects from millions of “dirty” fossil fuel spewing tailpipes daily compared to fewer, more distant, regulated power generation facilities.

EAANN hopes that interested drivers will come out to our Earth Day venue on April 22 at Reno’s Idlewild Park to see many different types of electric vehicles, and speak to EV owners/drivers. You might be surprised at how affordable EVs are, how they can save money for budget-strapped families, and how fun they are to drive!

Cynthia S. Ryan, electric vehicle and rooftop solar advocate, is co-chair of the Electric Auto Association of Northern Nevada.

2018 Cindy Avatar_Original.jpg

Our Turn.

The following article in the Reno-Gazette Journal (April 4, 2018) was authored by Cynthia Ryan, co-chair of the Electric Auto Association of Northern Nevada, and renewable energy advocate, in response to an op-ed piece, 'Is Your Neighbor's Tesla Costing You Money' by David Rothbard and Craig Rucker of CFACT.

Do EV's merely 'move' pollution?

A friend in Europe recently sent a cartoon showing a blissful EV driver tooling along the highway, unaware of the 'dirty' consequences of a coal-fired power plant (shown in the background) that provides the energy for his electric vehicle.

This is a very common mis-understanding about the energy efficiency and environmental benefit to be derived from electric vehicles. I thought this was a great opportunity take a look at the facts in regard to the real world impacts of driving an EV.

A good place to start is this piece .... by Gregory Milligan, as it appears on Electric Highway. I've kept the original links, including Australian data which is generally applicable across most industrialized countries. At the of the article I've provided some relevant U.S. data for comparison.

I'd also like to note that among our Nevada EV group, rooftop solar - in many cases - came before our electric vehicle. The EV was a logical extension of our efforts to provide clean, renewable and low-cost energy. This isn't always the case in other countries, or for those EV drivers living in densely populated urban areas/multiple unit housing where rooftop solar isn't an option. The key often lies in the final paragraphs of Mr. Milligan's piece - if the pollution is unavoidable, do you want the pollution on the city streets or in a more distant location, where it can be better managed via sophisticated 'scrubbers' and utility regulations? The negative effects of petroleum extraction are often not fully appreciated by those claiming that EV's aren't all that green. Similarly, as growing numbers of EV's provide cleaner air in the more densely populated urban areas, improved human health is also a benefit of cleaner transportation - i.e. less pollution related diseases like chronic lung and heart disease.

 "I pollute and I am ashamed!!!" "Yippee! I roll clean!"

"I pollute and I am ashamed!!!" "Yippee! I roll clean!"

 

Do Electric Vehicles Merely Move Pollution?

by Gregory Milligan

One of the most common arguments against EVs goes something like this; “EVs are not environmentally friendly, all they do is move the pollution to a big dirty power station and make people feel good about doing nothing helpful at all”. This article will dispel that myth.

Firstly, we need to talk about efficiency…this is where an internal combustion engine fares very poorly and an electric motor does very well.

An internal combustion engine, whether it be petrol or diesel, is a very inefficient device. There are many moving parts, each of which has friction. The pistons fly up and down the cylinders at enormous speed, yet at the end of each stroke they must be brought to a complete stop then accelerated back in the other direction in a few milliseconds. Each piston has rings sealing the gap between the piston and cylinder, which create drag. The lubricating oil and coolant must be pumped around taking useful energy to do so. Much of the energy obtained by burning the fuel in the cylinders is lost as heat, either down the exhaust or piped away by the coolant to the radiator where it is dumped as waste heat. Not all of the fuel is completely burned, and the by-products are lost in the exhaust. The noise made by the engine is also lost energy that comes from the petrol you are burning. A modern petrol engine is around 25% efficient, meaning that three quarters of the energy in that petrol you pour into the tank is wasted…older cars and cars in bad tune can be down to 15% efficient, and even the most advanced direct injection economy cars being developed now are only around 35% efficient.

Electric motors are by contrast very efficient, with most offering better than 80% efficiency and many getting 90% or better. Two of the most popular motors used in home conversions, the HPEVS AC-50 and the Netgain Warp 9, both have efficiency ratings of 88%.

The next step in the drive train is the transmission, which is another area where EVs shine over their counterparts.

Because an internal combustion engine needs to be spinning pretty fast to make enough power to move a car away from a stop, and it makes its power in a fairly narrow speed range, it needs to have a multi speed transmission, usually a manual transmission with 3 to 6 speeds, or an automatic with 2 to 8 speeds depending on how new or fancy the car is. Older cars with big flexible engines often had 3 speed transmissions where smaller less flexible engines needed more gears.

An electric car with a DC motor still usually has a multi speed transmission, but because an electric motor delivers full torque from standstill until near its maximum speed, they don’t need a clutch or torque converter and simply move off from stopped, and they usually need only two speeds in the transmission. The reason they need a two speed transmission is that DC motors don’t spin at very high speeds so if they have a single gear ratio it needs to be high enough to give the car highway speed without overspeeding the motor. This is like taking off in third gear in your petrol car, so you can imagine for this to work the motor needs to be very powerful. Even so, a two speed transmission has less gears than a 5 speed and is more efficient.

An AC motor on the other hand can spin at speeds of more than 10,000 revolutions per minute (RPM) which means that highway speeds can be obtained with a single gear ratio that is low enough to allow a relatively small motor to take off from a standing start. This is the drive system used in all production EVs and increasingly in home conversions, and offers both the increased efficiency of a 3 phase AC motor as well as the more efficient single gear transmission.

So, just how much energy is lost in the transmission? In the bad old days of “slushbox” automatic transmissions up to 30% of the power that left the motor would never make it to the road. Modern drive trains can be a lot better, losing only 10%, but the single speed transmission on a modern EV loses more like 5%. Not as big a factor as the motor efficiency, but not to be ignored either!

We have another loss that applies only to EVs though. Not all of the power that leaves the wall socket makes it into the battery, and not all of the energy in the battery makes it to the motor. I have measured the actual energy consumption of my i MiEV and the wall to motor efficiency is approximately 80%, so 10% of the power is getting lost in the charging phase, and another 10% is lost as the power is extracted from the batteries and run through the controller. In this analysis we will be calculating wall to wheel efficiency, so the worst possible scenario for the EV, but the most honest one.

So…we will do a comparison between an average modern petrol car and a modern EV.

Assuming petrol engine efficiency to be 30%, transmission efficiency to be 90%, with electric motor efficiency at 90% and single reduction gear efficiency at 95% and charging efficiency at 80%.

This gives a total efficiency of 27% for the petrol car and 68% for the EV. The EV is more than two and a half times as efficient with its energy as the petrol car. An older petrol car with an old tech automatic and carburetor engine would be even worse, with perhaps 10% total efficiency…..

This assumes constant speed driving…in reality most driving is in the city where we are either idling in traffic jams, or stopping and starting constantly at traffic lights or intersections. This is where the EV is at its most efficient…when stopped at a traffic light the EV is using no energy at all! The petrol car is idling and burning petrol, although modern “soft hybrid” cars are helping this by switching the petrol engine off while stopped and restarting it instantly when you go to move off. Even then, the petrol engines are operating in the less efficient part of their operating range whereas EVs are in their high efficiency conditions.

Another part of the equation for EVs is the power loss between the power station and the end user. This is often cited as being a major factor in making EVs no better than petrol cars, but in fact power losses in transmission are pretty low, as long distance transmission is done at high voltages where losses are around 1%, while lower voltage lines in suburban areas have higher losses. The total loss is usually around 6-8%, with the USA average being 6%.

So…..we have established that the EV is far more efficient with energy than an internal combustion car, even taking into account transmission losses. We now need to consider where that power is coming from.

Of course, if you are in an area where the power is all generated by renewable sources, such as Tasmania where I live where all of our power is from Hydrowind, or solar, then you are truly running a zero emission vehicle.

Most of us are not that lucky, and live in an area where the power is generated by a mixture of renewable and fossil fuels. Almost nowhere is the power completely generated by fossil fuels, but for the sake of it, let’s look at the worst of them all, brown coal.

An ordinary coal fired power plant is around 35% efficient. Some high tech coal plants are over 50% efficient, but we will look at the worst ones we are likely to see in Australia. Taking the coal plant as being 35% efficient and the grid as 94% efficient and using our previously calculated 68% efficiency for the EV, we get a total system efficiency in the worst case scenario of 22%, which is an efficiency slightly worse than the petrol car….but this is the absolute worst case scenario. In fact Australia’s overall average is 86% fossil fuel and 14% renewables, and if we take this as the average mixture being used for your EV then the total efficiency of the system is now around 27%, or about the same as for the petrol car.

So…this merely proves the claim of pollution relocation right?

Not quite. We haven’t finished with petrol cars yet for the true system efficiency.

Oil as it comes out of the ground isn’t ready for your petrol tank. First of all it has to be shipped halfway around the world, then it needs to be refined. This involves heating it to boiling point and subjecting it to a process called fractional distillation. The lighter elements in the oil rise and the heavy ones sink, and each one is tapped off and subjected to further refining, such as catalytic cracking and blending etc until the final petrol is produced. This uses enormous amounts of energy.

The actual amount of energy used to refine petrol is the subject of debate and controversy, and is variable dependant on a number of factors including the quality of crude oil being used (really good crude needs less energy to refine, tar sands need HUGE amounts of energy, and a range of grades in the middle…) as well as the efficiency of the refinery and the energy mix being used at the refinery. Making accurate analysis harder is the reluctance of oil companies to provide the raw data, however several studies have been done which give some idea. Refinery process is around 85-90% efficient, and the total process of extracting the oil and producing petrol from it seems to be approximately 80% efficient.

This would give a total system efficiency of the petrol car as approximately 21%, which is slightly worse than the EV being run on pure brown coal electricity.

Several studies have concluded that it takes between 4 and 6 kWh of electricity to refine a gallon of petrol (around four and a half litres) and that amount of electricity could power an EV for the same distance as that gallon of petrol could power an average modern petrol car. As I said above, the actual numbers are hard to verify, and on the face of it the 6 kWh figure seems plausible, but looking deeper at it I believe that figure is somewhat too high. Whatever the actual figure is, it is clear that a lot of energy is used in refining and shipping petrol and this needs to be remembered when calculating the efficiency of petrol cars vs electric.

So, in conclusion, we have no clear cut exact difference, but rather a range of numbers dependant on variable factors.

An EV running on purely renewable power generated close to its charging location, such as home solar panels, will be around 68% efficient.

One running on renewable energy drawn from the grid will be around 64% efficient.

If running off the current (2015) Australian average mix of renewable and fossil fuelled grid, it will be around 27% efficient and if running on pure coal fired power the figure is 22%.

A petrol car of a modern type in good tune will be around 21% efficient if you take the lower numbers for power used in refining petrol. By the higher estimates it will be more like 10%.

Of course if the petrol car we are comparing is an older carburettor engine with an automatic transmission then we are already down at 10% or less before we even factor in the energy used refining fuel…

To summarise, in the worst case scenario, where the EV is being run on pure fossil fuel electricity, the “moving the pollution” argument is not far from the truth. If you are running an EV on “green power” or fully renewable generated electricity, the EV is between two and three times as efficient as the petrol car. Mixtures of power source will skew that number in either direction.

And there is one more part of the argument that is often ignored….what is wrong with moving the pollution anyway? If two modes of transport are going to generate the same amount of pollution, would you rather that pollution be generated in the midst of where people live, work, play…or is it better to generate that pollution away from population centres? I know which one I would pick…

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Engine_efficiency

http://www.consumerenergycenter.org/transportation/consumer_tips/vehicle_energy_losses.html

https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/atv.shtml

http://www.evwest.com/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=83

http://www.evwest.com/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=49

http://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.cfm?id=105&t=3

http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/articles/2007/07/energy-efficiency-in-the-power-grid-49238.html

http://www.originenergy.com.au/blog/about-energy/energy-in-australia.html

http://greentransportation.info/guide/energy/electricity-to-refine-gallon-gasoline.html

http://gatewayev.org/how-much-electricity-is-used-refine-a-gallon-of-gasoline

https://www.google.com.au/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CCcQFjAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fgreet.es.anl.gov%2Ffiles%2F1c49xpjg&ei=H2aaVaGYH4SY8QWQkYPoAQ&usg=AFQjCNFNj86V3TM0Vokj1k74YGvzsebbnw&sig2=CP6-Q5Key7erJA2R1OHqNA&bvm=bv.96952980,d.dGY

https://www.google.com.au/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=3&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CC0QFjAC&url=https%3A%2F%2Fgreet.es.anl.gov%2Ffiles%2Fhl9mw9i7&ei=H2aaVaGYH4SY8QWQkYPoAQ&usg=AFQjCNGfSYw_JfDuyuD7XeJGiDtUfDvmzw&sig2=p7qViVizTJ7PCrZkXDyFsA&bvm=bv.96952980,d.dGY

 

U.S. Data:

Ratio of Various types of energy in the U.S. https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/?page=us_energy_home

 

A newbie experiences EV driving for the first time. In a Tesla.

Well, neither my Chevy Volt or Nissan LEAF came with 'Ludicrous' mode ... but they can both 0-60mph faster than the NHP would tolerate. Nimble. Smooth. Quiet. And, totally a hoot to drive - that's what electric cars are.

 Kaleb Roedel of Northern Nevada Business Weekly prepares to be amazed. Photo by Tom Polikalas of  SWEEP .

Kaleb Roedel of Northern Nevada Business Weekly prepares to be amazed. Photo by Tom Polikalas of SWEEP.

Kaleb Roedel, of Northern Nevada Business Weekly got a taste of why we LOVE our electric cars with Jack Bowers of Reno, and Guy Hall of SacEV.
Want to test a Tesla? I can help you with that. Guy Hall loves any old excuse to drive to Reno. And, Jack Bowers is always pretty keen to let his Tesla 'speak' to you. Snort.

Read on and watch the video. This article just might have you lusting after an electric vehicle sooner rather than later.

 Kaleb straps into the Millennium Falcon ... or rather a Tesla Model X owned by Jack Bowers

Kaleb straps into the Millennium Falcon ... or rather a Tesla Model X owned by Jack Bowers

Time to get ready for Earth Day 2018

Once again, EAANN will be gathering for Earth Day 2018, Sunday, April 22nd, at beautiful Idlewild Park, 2055 Idlewild Dr., Reno, Nevada 89509, on the banks of the scenic Truckee River. We are inviting all EV owners to bring their cars and help us spread the word about the benefits of driving electric.

As before, we will be in the Future of Transportation venue. 

 EAANN at the 2017 Earth Day

EAANN at the 2017 Earth Day

If you plan on bringing a car, we need for participants to arrive no later than 9:30 a.m. so that we can arrange the cars to best advantage. Help setting up the tent, tables and banner will be helpful, too. We suggest bringing your own lawn chairs, drinks and snacks. If you'd like to bring some extra nibbles for the crew, that will be appreciated.

The park will open to participants at 9:00 a.m. The main event starts at 11:00 a.m. and continues until 6:00 p.m. - although we usually wrap it up about 2:00 p.m.

 We had a great complement of EVs last year!

We had a great complement of EVs last year!

Please let us know if you plan to bring a vehicle - the sooner we know how many cars, the better able we can plan. Contact Chuck Swackhammer, or Cindy Ryan to reserve your spot, or for questions. We'll be sending out more specific details as we have them.

 

Myanmar, electric cars, and a more sustainable world

Tonight, I had a rare opportunity to engage with a delegation from Myanmar about their efforts to create a more sustainable world. And, give them rides in electric cars. I can't help myself. Snort. 

These folks - impressive young people - are serious, and committed to effecting change in their country. I came away from this unique gathering inspired and energized. I wish that I saw as many young folks here that were as committed. Sadly, I found out - from one of the local scientists at this gathering - that Washoe County Schools are passing on this years' science fairs. Not even the much vaunted STEM academies are participating ... I was flabergasted. SpaceX launches the biggest cargo rocket, with the coolest cargo, into space and nobody's interested in science?

The world wants a sustainable future. People across the globe are looking for ways that we can make that happen. But, it will be harder without a new generation of scientists from our schools.

This documentary answers a lot of the questions we all have about the extent of the problem, and steps that each and every one of us can take. Now.

Oh, and Elon Musk and the Gigafactory are featured.

Before the Flood with Leonardo DiCaprio on Netflix

Screenshot 2018-02-10 22.32.40.png